Are Insurers Overcharging
in Your State?

Loss ratios reveal how much of every premium dollar flows back to policyholders as claims. When ratios sit well below 70% year after year, insurers may be collecting more than the underlying risk warrants. Consumers end up paying the price.

Read the report: How to Lower the Insurance Tax by $150 Billion →

This site draws on 25 years of NAIC data (2000–2024), spanning every state and five major insurance lines.

What is a loss ratio?

Claims paid ÷ premiums earned. A 75% ratio means 75¢ of every premium dollar goes to claims. The remainder covers insurer expenses, profit, and reserves.

When is it too low?

A 70–80% loss ratio is generally considered fair. States consistently below 70% may be overcharging policyholders relative to actual risk — particularly when that pattern persists across a decade.

What does the research say?

Researchers at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator have analyzed these loss ratios and proposed federal and state reforms to address overpriced insurance. Their papers explain what fair loss ratios look like and how regulation can bring premiums in line with actual risk. Read the research →

Why does state variation matter?

Insurers file separate rates in each state. Where regulation is weak or markets are concentrated, low loss ratios can persist for years. Sustained underperformance suggests premiums are not calibrated to risk and that regulatory intervention may be warranted.

Explore the data

Loss Ratios by Insurance Line

View:
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 5-Year Average Loss Ratio (2020–2024)
Sorted lowest → highest  ·  Red/green lines = 70%/80% fair range  ·  Black line = national average
Below 70% — potential overpricing 70–80% — fair range Above 80% — high claims │ red=70%  │ green=80%
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 5-Year Average Loss Ratio Heatmap (2020–2024)
Deep red = far below 70% · Amber = near fair range · Green = above 80% · Gray = insufficient data · National average shown below legend · Hover for details
Low (<40%)
High (>120%)
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 10-Year Average Loss Ratio (2015–2024)
Sorted lowest → highest  ·  Red/green lines = 70%/80% fair range  ·  Black line = national average
Below 70% — potential overpricing 70–80% — fair range Above 80% — high claims │ red=70%  │ green=80%
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 10-Year Average Loss Ratio Heatmap
Deep red = far below 70% · Amber = near fair range · Green = above 80% · Gray = insufficient data · National average shown below legend · Hover for details
Low (<40%)
High (>120%)
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 25-Year Average Loss Ratio (2000–2024)
Sorted lowest → highest  ·  Red/green lines = 70%/80% fair range  ·  Black line = national average
Below 70% — potential overpricing 70–80% — fair range Above 80% — high claims │ red=70%  │ green=80%
Homeowners Multiple Peril — 25-Year Average Loss Ratio Heatmap (2000–2024)
Deep red = far below 70% · Amber = near fair range · Green = above 80% · Gray = insufficient data · National average shown below legend · Hover for details
Low (<40%)
High (>120%)
Homeowners Multiple Peril — Annual Loss Ratios by State (2015–2024)
All raw annual values used to compute averages · Hover column headers to sort
Homeowners Multiple Peril — Loss Ratio Trends by State (2015–2024)
Selected large states · Hover a point for details · Click a line or legend entry to isolate it · Dashed black line = national average
Watch: We Uncovered Where Your Insurance Payments Are Really Going →

Methodology & Data Sources

All loss ratios come directly from the NAIC Market Share Reports for Property/Casualty Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide, published annually, covering report years 2000–2024.

Lines covered: Homeowners Multiple Peril, Total Private Passenger Auto, Workers' Compensation, Total Commercial Multiple Peril, and Other Liability. Years a state reported N/A (typically monopoly state funds) are excluded from its average; states with fewer than three valid years for a line are shown as N/A. The "National Average" line on each chart is the countrywide industry-wide direct loss ratio for that line, taken from each report's summary table.

The 70–80% range is a reference, not a fixed actuarial constant — it reflects loss ratios at which premiums broadly track claims after typical expenses and reserves, and the appropriate level varies by line. Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator research proposes a minimum loss-ratio floor of 80%; persistent results below this range may warrant regulatory attention. See the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator insurance research.

Data source: National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC).

Researchers at the Vanderbilt Policy Accelerator built this microsite using Claude (Anthropic) as a tool, directing it to extract and average loss-ratio data from annual NAIC reports covering report years 2000–2024 and to generate the interactive visualizations. They verified the underlying data on a sampling basis against the original NAIC source documents.